The End of the New York Times Disunion Blog

This weekend marked the end of the New York Times Civil War blog, Disunion. For the past four years historians, writers, and other scholars have submitted literally hundreds of blog posts about the Civil War covering a wide range of topics related to politics, culture, memory, military operations, Indian wars, global responses to the war, and so much more. I was a regular reader of the blog and know a few college professors who assigned posts from the site for classroom readings. I didn’t agree with every post that was published, but the discussions I observed on and offline with friends and colleagues demonstrate to me the success of the blog in challenging readers to check their prior assumptions about the war. Based on the amount of online comments each article garnered it seems like the blog was very popular, and it reinforces to me that blogging (and social media more broadly) is an effective tool for communicating the stuff of history to public audiences. I am going to miss Disunion.

I’m sure the blog is ending in order to coincide with the end of the Civil War sesquicentennial this month, but I actually think now is as important a time as ever to have a space with a large readership like the New York Times for discussing the challenges and consequences of the war’s aftermath during the Reconstruction era. While the blog’s conclusion makes sense from a chronological viewpoint, I can’t help but feel like some juicy learning opportunities will be sacrificed because of it. Al Mackey of Student of the Civil War suggests that a new blog called Reunion could succeed Disunion and focus on the effort to reconcile a fractured nation after the war. I think that’s a wonderful idea, although I doubt anyone at the Times is thinking about such an effort.

Thanks to the writers and editors for the great content and let’s keep focused on ways to talk about Reconstruction as we hit the sesquicentennial of this important and largely misunderstood period in U.S. history.



4 responses

  1. Nick, any sense of who we could write to at the Times to ask that a Reconstruction blog continue Disunion’s work?

    1. That’s a good question, Pat. I don’t know who to contact, but I’m curious what Clay Risen, the editor of Disunion, will be doing now that the blog is finished.

  2. […] Sacco has a blog post today offering some thoughts on the end of the NY Times Disunion blog, and calling for a “Reunion” blog to cover […]

  3. Reblogged this on Samantha Gordon and commented:
    It’s sad to see such a great collaboration come to an end.

What do you think? Leave a comment here!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: