About Me


Nicholas W. Sacco

My name is Nick Sacco. I was born and raised in Saint Louis, Missouri, and continue to live here working as a public historian and writer. I have lived in this city most of my life with the exception of a couple years living in Indianapolis, Indiana.

I hold two Bachelor of Arts degrees in History Education and Music Performance (Electric and Upright Bass) from Lindenwood University (2011) and a Master’s degree in History with a concentration in Public History from IUPUI (2014). I am also a certified teacher of Social Studies, grades 5-12. I am a member of the National Council on Public History, the Missouri Council for History Education, Pi Gamma Mu, Alpha Lambda Delta, and Phi Alpha Theta.

I have been involved with public history since 2010 and have worked for the National Park Service, the National Council on Public History, the Indiana State House, the Missouri Historical Society Library and Research Center, and as a teaching assistant for the Orchard Farm School District in St. Charles, Missouri. To read more about my professional experiences, take a look at my Curriculum Vitae.

My interest in this blog is twofold. First, I would like to use it as an outlet for my writing and research endeavors, which focus mostly on 19th Century American History, although there are other topics of interest to me. More importantly, I want to discuss strategies for educating people of all ages about the importance of history in our lives today. Reading a book about history is a good start towards obtaining knowledge about the past; being able to write about and communicate that knowledge to others in an effective manner is a whole other challenge I hope to meet through this blog.

39 thoughts on “About Me

  1. I found this very interesting reading. My late wife, Lorraine, was national historian for the Woman’s Relief Corps, Auxiliary to the GAR. She had many NY department and national journals that came from the GAR’s national headquarters.

    Jerome Orton, Sons of Union Veterans
    Syracuse, NY
    I am in the telephone book

  2. I came across your blog from Al Mackey’s site. Unfortunately, I committed the crime of disagreeing with him and now with zero evidence he’s painting me as a anonymous phantom enemy, going so far to paint me as the bad guy by saying that he debated whether or not to let my comment through: http://studycivilwar.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/its-symbolic-annihilation-of-history-and-its-done-for-a-purpose/#comments I’ve only ever commented elsewhere once on his blog, and tried protesting my innocence in my latest comment, but of course he’s not going to let it past his moderation.

    By the company they keep, you shall know them. Keep that in mind as you view your blog roll.

    1. Hi Kristoffer,

      I’m not going to speculate or comment on the disagreements between Al and yourself. I’ve had several pleasant face-to-face interactions with Al, I enjoy reading his blog, and I respect his scholarship. Here at this blog I sometimes talk about the Civil War, but I also discuss a wide range of topics related to historical methods, public history, and pedagogy.

      Regarding my blog roll, I endorse each and every one of those blogs because I find them interesting, thought-provoking, and intellectually stimulating. Does that mean I must always agree with the content shared on those blogs? Of course not. Are some of those bloggers mean people online or in real life? Maybe, I don’t know. I simply enjoy them because they have important things to say that help me think in new ways about the past. Every blogger on the blog roll that I’ve interacted with online or in real life has been kind and generous to me, but your interactions with them might be different. I give you my best wishes and hope you enjoy reading my blog if you choose to do so in the future.

      1. I will keep reading your blog. I’m glad you recognize that people can have different experiences with the same person. 😎

    1. Thanks, Pat. I follow your Immigrants Civil War page on Facebook and enjoy reading your content. If you have any feedback to leave regarding the article, feel free to share your thoughts in the future!

      1. I will. Whenever these veteran studies are published, I always ask about the immigration aspects of these organizations. I usually get back blank stares from the authors. I am not sure why they are interested in how the GAR dealt with race, but not with immigration. A quarter of Union vets were immigrants. The native born vets were raised during the Know Nothing Era and ended their time here on earth in the Golden Age of 100% Americanism,

        1. There’s definitely a lot of room for historical analysis of the immigrant experience before, during, and after the Civil War. With regards to the GAR I found myself pretty surprised by how little discussion took place about the role of foreign-born veterans in the formation of the organization.

  3. Nick,
    I am a writer and musician from Virginia, and last year I completed a CD of original songs about the Civil War called “Dream of a Good Death”….I am more musician than historian, but I had a fine time researching and writing the songs. I now perform the CD in theaters as part of evening of music and lecture….kind of a TED-talk meets Roots/Americana concert.
    Anyway, I thought as a musician and historian yourself, you might be interested.
    And if you like it and are inclined, I’d love a brief review and inclusion on your links page.
    You can find it at civilwarsong.com and if you’d like, send me a address and I’ll put a CD in the mail.
    Clark Hansbarger

  4. Hi nick, great article on Frederick Dent (A parting gift from general Grant, 10-30-2014) I was wondering if you know what that gift might have been?

    1. Hi Chris,

      Before he died Grant asked that a check for $500 be sent to his brother-in-law Frederick Dent whenever the funds were available to do so. The Grants’ oldest son Fred mailed his uncle Dent the money in March 1886, eight months after Ulysses passed away.

    2. Hi Nick…Our review of Fred’s letter to his uncle left us with the impression that there may have been a present “in memory of old and happy days” in addition to the $500. If you are interested, I have a picture I would like to share with you; think it would clarify the reasoning behind my belief. If I’ve peaked your interest, please provide contact information where I can forward the picture. Looking forward to your response…

  5. Hi Mr Sacco, A fascinating Grant book to me is General Grant and his Campaigns by Julian K Larke. It was published in 1864.
    I suppose this book and a few more victories helped make him President. Is this the first biography of General Grant ?
    I list it as good because it is a journalistic style easy to read war adventure book.it also has a large appendix with several reports and orders, so some good source material.

    Of course I think Grant’s Memoir is one of the best War histories of Grant. I also include Sherman’s Memoirs because it has lots interactions with Grant.
    You have an excellent blog.
    Stan Hurder, Cleveland TN

    1. Thank you so much for the kind words, Stan.

      I’m not sure if Larke’s biography is the first one of Grant, but it’s one of the first. Orville James Victor has a section on Grant in his “Men of the Time: Being Biographies of Generals,” which was published in 1862, and Phineas Camp Headley wrote a full-length biography of Grant in 1864 entitled “The Hero Boy: Or, the Life and Deeds of Lieut-Gen. Grant.” Also, Albert D. Richardson wrote what at least a few Grant scholars consider to be one of the strongest early biographies of Grant, “A Personal History of Ulysses S. Grant,” which was published in 1868.

  6. Mr. Sacco. I’m not sure how I stumbled across your blog but I am glad I did. My son and I truly enjoy reading History Texts, especially those relating to the 19th century. My interests lie in American History, my son in European History. We are by no means Historians but I believe we will enjoy including your blog on our reading lists.

    1. Hi John,

      Thanks for giving my blog a read and for the kind words! Primary source documents are the wellspring from which we try to understand what happened in the past, and I really enjoy the detective work of finding documents to answer questions and strengthen arguments about a given historical topic. You might also want to check out my blog roll to see other history blogs that I enjoy following. Thanks again for reading!

  7. On this topic, you might be interested in the Tenement Museum’s experiences during the presidential campaign and following the election. As you might imagine, few museums have been hit with the new political reality quite so hard. Their mission of connecting immigration history with contemporary society puts them in the center of the debate:



  8. Hello, I recently attended my daughter’s 3rd grade field trip which took the students around to various monuments in Nashville, TN, including a couple of confederate statues. The person speaking to the children told a very lively story which painted the particular confederate soldier in a wholly flattering light and asked the students “Now, do you think he was a hero?” They all answered “Yes!” But there was no mention of what the confederate soldiers were fighting for. There was absolutely no mention of slavery at all that day. I really object to this and plan to address my concerns with her school. I’m wondering if you have any advice for how to approach this and particularly any recommended articles or supporting documents that would help me explain why this is wrong. I would really appreciate any help!

  9. Dear Nick Sacco: I stumbled onto your blog recently and am very glad that I did. I find your posts thoughtful and interesting, not to mention extremely well written. I’ve become very interested in Ulysses S. Grant and appreciate your perspective.

  10. Hi Nick Sacco,

    I am not sure how to contact you to comment about the words “enslave” and “slave”. What historically bothers me is these terms give a pass to the owners and profiteers of slavery. We fail to learn about the psychology of the society (ours) that allow slavery/enslaving to happen. We fail to examine the motivations of those who practice slavery. For me the word slave always pointed back to the owners. What can be done to grow a profound distaste for slavery. What can be done so that we examine our personal ethical system and our collective ethic system to guard against such perversions in the future.

    Thanks for your work on slave and enslave.

    1. Hi William,

      I have written several posts about the “enslaved people” vs. “slaves” debate, and the discussion in this post was particularly good https://pastexplore.wordpress.com/2015/07/10/the-paradoxical-nature-of-the-enslaved-person-vs-slave-name-debate/ we can continue the conversation here, however.

      To be honest, am I not sure how to respond to your comment. What term exists that wouldn’t give the enslaver a free pass? Can a single term force us to challenge our personal and collective ethic systems and prevent future enslavement of humans in the future? I don’t know. I believe “enslaved people” puts the focus back on the people who were its victims and acknowledges their humanity. I would love to hear your suggestions if you have a term that might better address the sorts of challenges you’ve described. Thanks for commenting!

  11. Hello! My name is Matt and I’m senior History major in Cleveland State University. I have an interest in Public History as a field and career path and was hoping I could ask you about Graduate programs and their relation to public history. Any information would be helpful!

    1. Hi, Matt.

      I would be happy to discuss public history graduate programs with you and answer any questions you might have. Feel free to drop me a line at nws361 [at] gmail dot com.

  12. Mr. Sacco,

    My name is Dustin Nightingale and I am writing you to say how much I appreciate your article on Grant and drinking and breaking down the arguments. Simply, I try to tell good writers that I appreciate them and with this I appreciate your ability to examine the examination. Well done, Sir.

    1. Hi Dustin,

      Thanks so much for reading the blog and for the kind words. I read Chernow’s Grant biography and felt like a lot of his claims about Grant’s drinking were suspect. The more I looked into it, the more I wanted to write my own rebuttal. Thanks again for reading!

  13. Hi Nick. On the “Remember Natchitoches When” facebook page, there’s a discussion going about “The Old Darky” (as I knew it) statue, and there is a link to your article as well. I just now read it. Thank you! Great read. Of course I knew growing up it was racist, but I never knew that history. I’ll be sharing your article with friends.

    1. Hi, Martha! Thanks for the kinds words and the trip down memory lane. As you could see with the comments made on the post at the time I published it, some folks got very angry with some of my interpretations. I assume it’ll be the same on that Facebook page, but as you saw, my larger argument was that you can’t simply throw a controversial monument into a museum and assume all of its problems will simply go away. Thanks for reading and sharing!

  14. Thank you for arranging this blog and for sharing your fascinating practice and knowledge from the lens of a public historian. Before stumbling on this page I didn’t have an inkling about public history as a formal discipline. I’m well aware of the concept of a citizen journalist, public intellectual, academic historian and other wings of practitioners of history. But public history is very unique; in some sense blends those different facets—truly interdisciplinary. I appreciate that you’re using new media and related platforms to implement your practice. Looking forward to reading your commentary on interesting periods in U.S. history and how it can be relevant for contemporary periods.

    1. Hello! I’m glad to hear that you’ve learned some new insights into public history. I don’t write on my blog as much as I used to, but have no intention of stopping anytime soon. Thanks for reading!

  15. And thank you for introducing the National Council on Public History! I’m contemplating of getting a membership in order to connect with folks and share knowledge. It sounds like a gem. Once things normalized hope the community of scholars and historians can convene in public forums.

What do you think? Leave a comment here!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s